Re: California law CA AB1043
Lorenzo Salvadore <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.hackers |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <Yo70XqqpKHb-mF2PMi_MlPqcM3B5ty18C0v9xHG_OjvUBWBF_pS36Ns1AbF2B8hMI8KXKLdxsmM4LP2NvMR5UG3dl8FKkYsGa7vS33eqv1o=@lorenzosalvadore.it> |
+1 Lorenzo Salvadore On Thursday, February 26th, 2026 at 20:40, vermaden <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > Ignore this bullshit. > > > > Temat: Re: California law CA AB1043 > Data: 2026-02-26 19:49 > Nadawca: "Tomek CEDRO" <[email protected]> > Adresat: "Lucas Holt" <[email protected]>; > DW: [email protected]; > > > > >> On Thu, Feb 26, 2026 at 4:12 PM Lucas Holt > wrote: > >> > >> California is requiring age verification checks for account creation > at > >> the OS level with a signal API to provide information to > applications in > >> 2027. They explicitly call out individual developers or companies > with > >> fines of 2500 dollars per child affected. > >> > >> I wondered if anyone has started looking into this on the FreeBSD > side. > >> The way I read this, we would need to implement changes when > creating > >> accounts, provide a mechanism to check from apps (library), and > provide > >> support within package managers to filter apps? Then browsers would > >> need to implement this and call the respective OS APIs for age > >> verification for desktop use. > >> > >> It seems like it makes sense for multiple *NIX systems to implement > a > >> similar mechanism across platforms. > >> > >> The paragraph near the bottom seems to indicate that it wouldn't > apply > >> to server use since indirect signals aren't required to be honored. > >> > >> For reference: > >> > >> https://legiscan.com/CA/text/AB1043/id/3269704 > > > > How about refusing to bend to bureaucratic tyranny and respond with > > ban from the Open-Source side in such cases right from start? Give > > them finger and they will take the whole hand next.. unless it's the > > middle finger and blessing to build their communist utopia on their > > own. They can steal what is free but they cannot force us to work for > > them for free. Whole Open-Source community should stand united and > > strong against this nonsense. > > > > They for sure know reaction of the free crowd, and they have already > > planned some sort of business behind this. We are their asset, and our > > consent. Do not consent. > > > > Let thinking people leave and see what happens next. Socialism turns > > communism when there is no more other people money and there is no > > food left. We had that in Eastern Europe, but some people need to feel > > on their own four letters. > > > > Who is John Galt? > > > > -- > > CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info > > > > > > > >