Re: California law CA AB1043

Lorenzo Salvadore <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.freebsd.devel.hackers
Message-ID <Yo70XqqpKHb-mF2PMi_MlPqcM3B5ty18C0v9xHG_OjvUBWBF_pS36Ns1AbF2B8hMI8KXKLdxsmM4LP2NvMR5UG3dl8FKkYsGa7vS33eqv1o=@lorenzosalvadore.it>
+1

Lorenzo Salvadore

On Thursday, February 26th, 2026 at 20:40, vermaden <[email protected]> wrote:

> +1
> 
> Ignore this bullshit.
> 
> 
> 
> Temat: Re: California law CA AB1043
> Data: 2026-02-26 19:49
> Nadawca: "Tomek CEDRO" &lt;[email protected]>
> Adresat: "Lucas Holt" &lt;[email protected]>;
> DW: [email protected];
> 
> >
> >> On Thu, Feb 26, 2026 at 4:12 PM Lucas Holt
>  wrote:
> >>
> >> California is requiring age verification checks for account creation
> at
> >> the OS level with a signal API to provide information to
> applications in
> >> 2027.  They explicitly call out individual developers or companies
> with
> >> fines of 2500 dollars per child affected.
> >>
> >> I wondered if anyone has started looking into this on the FreeBSD
> side.
> >> The way I read this, we would need to implement changes when
> creating
> >> accounts, provide a mechanism to check from apps (library), and
> provide
> >> support within package managers to filter apps?  Then browsers would
> >> need to implement this and call the respective OS APIs for age
> >> verification for desktop use.
> >>
> >> It seems like it makes sense for multiple *NIX systems to implement
> a
> >> similar mechanism across platforms.
> >>
> >> The paragraph near the bottom seems to indicate that it wouldn't
> apply
> >> to server use since indirect signals aren't required to be honored.
> >>
> >> For reference:
> >>
> >> https://legiscan.com/CA/text/AB1043/id/3269704
> >
> > How about refusing to bend to bureaucratic tyranny and respond with
> > ban from the Open-Source side in such cases right from start? Give
> > them finger and they will take the whole hand next.. unless it's the
> > middle finger and blessing to build their communist utopia on their
> > own. They can steal what is free but they cannot force us to work for
> > them for free. Whole Open-Source community should stand united and
> > strong against this nonsense.
> >
> > They for sure know reaction of the free crowd, and they have already
> > planned some sort of business behind this. We are their asset, and our
> > consent. Do not consent.
> >
> > Let thinking people leave and see what happens next. Socialism turns
> > communism when there is no more other people money and there is no
> > food left. We had that in Eastern Europe, but some people need to feel
> > on their own four letters.
> >
> > Who is John Galt?
> >
> > --
> > CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
> >
> >
> >
> 
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.