Re: kernel: ath0: device timeout
Ross Finlayson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.mobile |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>If changing the tx rate control algorithm really fixes it then that
>says sample may be handing back bogus rate codes. Since I can't
>make this happen someone else needs to dig.
>
>As to better performance, onoe is not especially good and I do not
>recommend it. However sample is too aggressive on up-shifting the
>tx rate and tends to vary the rate too quickly so can degrade
>performance when signal deteriorates. I have done extensive testing
>of all the rate control algorithms as well as a proprietary one and
>chose sample as the default.
Excuse the naive question, but if I were to try using a different
rate control algorithm than the default one, then how specifically
would I go about doing so? Currently I just do
kldload -v if_ath
Should I also (or instead?) run
kldload -v ath_rate_onoe
or something??
Ideally, I'd prefer not to have to change the default algorithm, but
something with the current "ath" driver is just not working well for me.
Ross.
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-mobile
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"