Re: kernel: ath0: device timeout

Ross Finlayson wrote:
> 
>> If changing the tx rate control algorithm really fixes it then that 
>> says sample may be handing back bogus rate codes.  Since I can't make 
>> this happen someone else needs to dig.
>>
>> As to better performance, onoe is not especially good and I do not 
>> recommend it.  However sample is too aggressive on up-shifting the tx 
>> rate and tends to vary the rate too quickly so can degrade performance 
>> when signal deteriorates.  I have done extensive testing of all the 
>> rate control algorithms as well as a proprietary one and chose sample 
>> as the default.
> 
> Excuse the naive question, but if I were to try using a different rate 
> control algorithm than the default one, then how specifically would I go 
> about doing so?  Currently I just do
> 
>         kldload -v if_ath
> 
> Should I also (or instead?) run
>         kldload -v ath_rate_onoe
> or something??
> 
> Ideally, I'd prefer not to have to change the default algorithm, but 
> something with the current "ath" driver is just not working well for me.

ath_rate.ko is the target built by any of ath_rate_sample, 
ath_rate_onoe, and ath_rate_amrr so if you're using modules you 
build+install whichever is appropriate and then kldload if_ath.  If 
you've got stuff compiled into the kernel then specify the appropriate 
device.

	Sam
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-mobile
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"