Re: smp and portupgrade
Kris Kennaway <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.smp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sun, Apr 02, 2006 at 08:57:30PM +1200, Andrew McNaughton wrote: > It would be nice if the ports system itself were multi-thread clean. > Presumably we'd want a flag in each appropriate port's makefile which > enabled a multi-threaded build where this is known to work. > > Equally, it would be nice if portupgrade were able to work on separate > ports in parallel where dependency structures allow for it. > > Are there any fundamental reasons why such things couldn't work? No..just a lot of work needed to make it happen. Kris
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEMIbFWry0BWjoQKURAvjVAJwP0rTEH+I00wNS51Qp6hSC//IeswCfc9OZ XWj1nLTZGXZM/mUcpgmVk2U= =lesJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----