Re: Low perf with smp
"Eric" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.smp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <027f01c657f4$0d0a66a0$65fd24c0@Eric> |
Sorry for time to answer, here is result in both case (with/withou SMP) with freebsd 4.11 : kern.timecounter.method: 0 kern.timecounter.hardware: i8254 If you want I can do new installation with freebsd 6.0 Thanks, Eric. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Kirkwood" <[email protected]> To: "Petri Helenius" <[email protected]> Cc: "Eric" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; "Lucas Holt" <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, April 02, 2006 1:34 AM Subject: Re: Low perf with smp > Petri Helenius wrote: >> Mark Kirkwood wrote: >> >>> >>> As I understand it, when you activate SMP a more accurate, but slower >>> timecounter is chosen (typically 'i8254' instead of 'TSC' on intel HW). >> >> >> ACPI-fast should be the default with SMP. It's significantly faster than >> i8254 >> > > Yeah - if his Dell has ACPI enabled. However, ACPI-fast is still slower > than say TSC. > > Eric, do you want to show us the output of > > $ sysctl kern.timecounter > > with and without SMP? > > Cheers > > Mark > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-smp > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]" > _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-smp To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"