Re: Low perf with smp

"Eric" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.freebsd.devel.smp
Message-ID <027f01c657f4$0d0a66a0$65fd24c0@Eric>
Sorry for time to answer, here is result in both  case (with/withou SMP) 
with freebsd 4.11 :

kern.timecounter.method: 0
kern.timecounter.hardware: i8254


If you want I can do new installation with freebsd 6.0

Thanks,

Eric.




----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Mark Kirkwood" <[email protected]>
To: "Petri Helenius" <[email protected]>
Cc: "Eric" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; "Lucas Holt" 
<[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, April 02, 2006 1:34 AM
Subject: Re: Low perf with smp


> Petri Helenius wrote:
>> Mark Kirkwood wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> As I understand it, when you activate SMP a more accurate, but slower 
>>> timecounter is chosen (typically 'i8254' instead of 'TSC' on intel HW).
>>
>>
>> ACPI-fast should be the default with SMP. It's significantly faster than 
>> i8254
>>
>
> Yeah - if his Dell has ACPI enabled. However, ACPI-fast is still slower 
> than say TSC.
>
> Eric, do you want to show us the output of
>
> $ sysctl kern.timecounter
>
> with and without SMP?
>
> Cheers
>
> Mark
> _______________________________________________
> [email protected] mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-smp
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
> 

_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-smp
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.