[Bug 239682] Default to devel/llvm90 when libLLVM/libclang are required or if /usr/bin/clang is not enough

[email protected]
Newsgroups gmane.os.freebsd.devel.x11
Message-ID <[email protected]/bugzilla/>
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239682

--- Comment #28 from Brooks Davis <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Jan Beich from comment #23)
I did prepare over the whole 9.0.0 cycle, I find your implications that I did
not offensive.

You are correct that some bugs won't be found until LLVM_DEFAULT is bumped, but
doing it without coordination with me (the PR does not count) and making the
switch the I was unavailable to respond to the reports is unacceptable.  I'm
upset that users are getting a less than ideal experience due to your needless
rush to bump the default and worse that we've inflicted it on the quarterly
branch effectively untested.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-x11
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.