[Bug 239682] Default to devel/llvm90 when libLLVM/libclang are required or if /usr/bin/clang is not enough
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.x11 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]/bugzilla/> |
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239682 --- Comment #29 from Warner Losh <[email protected]> --- Let's also look at the timeline: September 19th: 9.0.0 was released September 25th: llvm90 port was updated to 9.0.0 release September 28th: LLVM_DEFAULT bumped. 3 days is too fast. It broke things like llvm (I burned half a day digging out from that mess after I updated after the packages were built). It couldn't have possibly been tested in just 3 days. Finally, the exprun for FreeBSD base has kept it from upgrading to 9.0 because the fallout from this upgrade is too large. Let that sink in: we can't upgrade base because llvm 9.0 is too broken. And yet it got rushed in just before the quarterly branch. This is not sound engineering. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-x11 To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"