Re: Ports with version numbers going backwards: lang/typescript-go, net-im/tg_ow...
Rene Ladan <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.x11 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat, Apr 04, 2026 at 04:46:48PM +0000, Sergey A. Osokin wrote: > On Sat, Apr 04, 2026 at 12:58:08PM +0000, [email protected] wrote: > > ** The following ports have a version number that sorts before a previous one ** > > > > For many package tools to work correctly, it is of utmost importance that > > version numbers of a port form a monotonic increasing sequence over time. > > Refer to the FreeBSD Porter's Handbook, 'Package Naming Conventions' for > > more information. Tools that won't work include pkg_version, portupgrade > > and portaudit. A common error is an accidental deletion of PORTEPOCH. > > > > Please fix any errors as soon as possible. > > > > The ports tree was updated at Sat Apr 4 2026 12:30:00 UTC. > > > > - *net-im/tg_owt* <[email protected]>: tg_owt-0.0.20250309 < tg_owt-0.0.20251212_3 > > We're for a way to improve handling of the net-im/tg_owt version, could you > guide me how to improve that: tg_owt is the date-based material, no official > releases, https://github.com/desktop-app/tg_owt. > Hmm, for a moment I thought you could use something like a commit count as I have done in sysutils/apt-mirror-devel but that still requires an official tag I guess. Maybe somebody else has a better idea? > In case we (fluffy and osa) see a new commit in the tree, we > update the version with the date the commit was made. > > Last time it was a typo, we'd definitely need to bump version with > the actual year, fluffy is going to fix that asap. Thanks, Dima! > Kind regards, René > -- > Sergey A. Osokin