maintainer-approval requested: [Bug 296195] graphics/nvidia-drm-612-kmod, graphics/drm-612-kmod: General Protection Fault in __nv_drm_gem_nvkms_handle_vma_fault, lkpi_vmf_insert_pnf_prot_locked, vm_page_busy_acquire : [Attachment 272323] Patch to apply onto ports tree

Tomoaki AOKI <[email protected]> has asked freebsd-x11 (Nobody)
<[email protected]> for maintainer-approval:
Bug 296195: graphics/nvidia-drm-612-kmod, graphics/drm-612-kmod: General
Protection Fault in __nv_drm_gem_nvkms_handle_vma_fault,
lkpi_vmf_insert_pnf_prot_locked, vm_page_busy_acquire
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=296195

Attachment 272323: Patch to apply onto ports tree
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=272323&action=edit



--- Comment #22 from Tomoaki AOKI <[email protected]> ---
Created attachment 272323
  --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=272323&action=edit
Patch to apply onto ports tree

Fortunately, no one others pops in claiming the patch doesn't work.
So reorganized previous patch as below.

  *Distribute centralized patches into each master ports.

  *Remove an exisiting unconditional patch from graphics/nvidia-drm-515-kmod
   and re-implement as REINPLACE in graphics/nvidia-drm-kmod/Makefile.common
   with additional comments for clarification.

  *PORTREVISION bumps to let official pkg builders to pick these.

Note that metaports graphics/nvidia-drm-kmod{-580|-devel} are NOT bumped
as these should be NO need to be rebuilt here.

The second item is because the patch patch-nvidia-drm-gem.c is unlikely to be
upstreamed (as upstream driver tarball does NOT provided per-DRM version basis)
and could be easily forgotton what for in the future.
Even though the implementation is a bit ugly, but REINPLACE with comments would
be
harder to be forgotton "why".

A review would be opened for this shortly.