[Bug 296195] graphics/nvidia-drm-612-kmod, graphics/drm-612-kmod: General Protection Fault in __nv_drm_gem_nvkms_handle_vma_fault, lkpi_vmf_insert_pnf_prot_locked, vm_page_busy_acquire

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=296195

Tomoaki AOKI <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Attachment #272190|0                           |1
        is obsolete|                            |
                 CC|                            |[email protected]
 Attachment #272323|                            |maintainer-approval?(x11@Fr
              Flags|                            |eeBSD.org)

--- Comment #22 from Tomoaki AOKI <[email protected]> ---
Created attachment 272323
  --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=272323&action=edit
Patch to apply onto ports tree

Fortunately, no one others pops in claiming the patch doesn't work.
So reorganized previous patch as below.

  *Distribute centralized patches into each master ports.

  *Remove an exisiting unconditional patch from graphics/nvidia-drm-515-kmod
   and re-implement as REINPLACE in graphics/nvidia-drm-kmod/Makefile.common
   with additional comments for clarification.

  *PORTREVISION bumps to let official pkg builders to pick these.

Note that metaports graphics/nvidia-drm-kmod{-580|-devel} are NOT bumped
as these should be NO need to be rebuilt here.

The second item is because the patch patch-nvidia-drm-gem.c is unlikely to be
upstreamed (as upstream driver tarball does NOT provided per-DRM version basis)
and could be easily forgotton what for in the future.
Even though the implementation is a bit ugly, but REINPLACE with comments would
be
harder to be forgotton "why".

A review would be opened for this shortly.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.