Re: new DragonFly-3.2 scheduler and PostgreSQL comparision with FreeBSD 9.1-RC1
Mike Jakubik <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.performance |
|---|---|
| Organization | Intertainservices |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2012-10-12 05:21 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 12 October 2012 11:10, Miroslav Lachman <[email protected]> wrote: >> I don't like comparing Release Candidates without any details about >> config, >> but the fact that DF 3.2 is much better than DF 3.0 is interesting. >> And they >> are very close to performance of Scientific Linux 6.2. > > Hey cool! And FreeBSD-9.1 is on there and doing worse than Linux and > Dragonfly BSD. I wonder why that is. > > Lemme cross post this a little to see what people think. > >> >> http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/users/2012-October/017536.html >> >> Graphs are available as PDF attachments >> >> >> http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20121010/7996ff88/attachment-0002.pdf >> >> >> http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20121010/7996ff88/attachment-0003.pdf These numbers show very significant improvements. Any possibility/interests in porting this scheduler to FreeBSD or this too much work? I know many have and still complain about our current scheduler. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"