Re: new DragonFly-3.2 scheduler and PostgreSQL comparision with FreeBSD 9.1-RC1
Erik Cederstrand <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.performance |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Den 20/11/2012 kl. 22.03 skrev Mike Jakubik <[email protected]>: > On 2012-10-12 05:21 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: >> On 12 October 2012 11:10, Miroslav Lachman <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I don't like comparing Release Candidates without any details about config, >>> but the fact that DF 3.2 is much better than DF 3.0 is interesting. And they >>> are very close to performance of Scientific Linux 6.2. >> >> Hey cool! And FreeBSD-9.1 is on there and doing worse than Linux and >> Dragonfly BSD. I wonder why that is. >> >> Lemme cross post this a little to see what people think. >> >>> http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/users/2012-October/017536.html >>> >>> Graphs are available as PDF attachments >>> >>> http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20121010/7996ff88/attachment-0002.pdf >>> >>> http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20121010/7996ff88/attachment-0003.pdf > > These numbers show very significant improvements. Any possibility/interests in porting this scheduler to FreeBSD or this too much work? I know many have and still complain about our current scheduler. According to the last PDF, the scheduler is only part of the picture. It seems this email by Matt Dillon sums up the changes: http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/users/2012-September/017490.html Erik _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"