Re: Beta vs. Stable
Francisco Angel Barrau Villacampa <[email protected]> Sun, 10 Nov 2002 16:24:05 -0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freedos.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Im new in the list, my opinion is the one of a simple user. But I agree
Aitor's opinion. In my case, I do a good amount of bats, makros and small
programs with xywrite in a Win98se system at home. Xywrite runs fine in
Freedos, but as the behavior of MS-Dos and Freedos sometimes are differen't,
you must program twice: to run in the Win98 and to run them under Freedos.
Nothing dramatically but... I think a lot of the succes of the MS company
was to try to make easy the life of the simplest user. Many people learned
MS-Dos and will be happy to avoid to learn again to finally do the same...
Of course, nothing against new opcions, programs, to enrich the OS.
Best regards.
Francisco
----- Original Message -----
From: Aitor Santamaria Merino <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2002 12:57 AM
Subject: Re: [fd-dev] Beta vs. Stable
> Eric Auer wrote:
>
> >Hi, I disagree...
> >MEM works just fine. We should not aim to be command-switch compatible to
> >everything, as long as we offer the same features.
> >
> I entirely disagree here, sorry. I admit I just forgot about it, now
> that Bart mentioned it.
> I am strongly for parameter compatibility in MEM, otherwise I (one)
> have/has to be learning the new syntax all the time.
>
> >The only exception are
> >commands that get used in batch files (okay, you can run MEM in a batch
> >file, but I meant "commonly used"). A user will be happy with the
features
> >of MEM and recognize that MEM can do what MS MEM can do.
> >
> If this person knows nothing about MEM and just runs the script, can't
> figure out what's going on. Ok, a extreme case, but still...
>
> >What kernel interrupts are still missing for MS DOS 5.0 compatibility?
> >
> Could I mention (I guess it isn't yet implemented):
> INT 21h/6602h "SET CODEPAGE"
> which is the one that the internal CHCP triggers?
>
> > This list is "too short to be true", what else do we have?
>
> Now that I think of it, every time I open the kernel bugtrack, I see
> tones of comments saying "this program will not run with FreeDOS xxx".
> Maybe that's a good place to look at what isn't working.
>
> Aitor
>
> ----------
> list options/archives/etc.: http://www.topica.com/lists/fd-dev
> unsubscribe: send blank email to: [email protected]
>
>