Re: To Pierre

Anton Tagunov <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.hurd.l4
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Anton>  RIAA needs both "non-free" OS + Chip to enforce real DRM

Pierre> And as far as enforcing DRM is concerned, a free OS is as
Pierre> good as a proprietary one. TPM doesn't relies on closeness
Pierre> of source code but on cryptographic protocols

Right! In desire of brevity I've misused words. What I mean is

if all computer owners run a Free OS that _also_
allows memory inspection for any process (w/o it's permission!)
then DRM is bustered.



Pierre> blackbox algorithms don't require opaque memory
Pierre> replace process instanciation by service invocation
Pierre> to achieve blackbox algorithms

Got you.
Hope a discussion may stem in my new mail thread:

     "To Jonathan [backdoor]"

where I advocate the notion of a "backdoor" for computer
owner to inspect memory of any process.

Anton
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.