[gnu-pl] wwwgnudiff - raport nr 463

--- prev/www/licenses/license-list.html	Fri Jan  7 05:27:57 2005
+++ curr/www/licenses/license-list.html	Sun Jan  9 05:28:00 2005
@@ -190,5 +190,5 @@
 <dd>
 This is a simple, permissive non-copyleft free software license,
-compatible with the GNU GPL.  It is sometime ambiguously referred to as
+compatible with the GNU GPL.  It is sometimes ambiguously referred to as
 the <strong>MIT License</strong>.
 <p></p></dd>
@@ -924,5 +924,5 @@
 
 <dt><a href="http://www.opensource.org/licenses/rpl.php">
-Reciprocal Public License</A></dt>
+Reciprocal Public License</a></dt>
 <dd>
 The Reciprocal Public License is a non-free license because of three
@@ -1149,5 +1149,6 @@
 
 
-<dt>The <a href="http://squeak.org/license.html">Squeak license</a>.</dt>
+<dt>The <a href="http://squeak.org/license.html">Squeak license</a></dt>
+<dd>
 As applied to software, this is not a free software license because
 it requires all users in whatever country to obey US export control
@@ -1184,5 +1185,5 @@
 
 <hr />
-  
+
 <p> <strong>The following licenses do qualify as
 <a href="/philosophy/free-doc.html">free documentation</a> licenses:</strong></p>
@@ -1286,10 +1287,10 @@
 
 <dt><a href="http://dmoz.org/license.html">Open Directory License (aka dmoz.org License)</a></dt>
-<p><dd>
+<dd>
 This is not a free documentation license.  The primary problems are that
 your right to redistribute any given version is not permanent and that it
 requires the user to keep checking back at that site, which is too
 restrictive of the user's freedom.
-</p></dd>
+</dd>
 
 
@@ -1306,5 +1307,4 @@
 <dt><a href="/licenses/gpl.html">GNU General Public License</a></dt>
 <dd>
-<p>
 The GNU GPL <strong>can</strong> be used for general data which is not
 software, as long as one can determine what the definition of "source
@@ -1312,46 +1312,48 @@
 below) also requires that you determine what the "source code" is,
 using approximately the same definition that the GPL uses.
-</p></dd>
+<p></p></dd>
 
 
 <dt><a href="/copyleft/fdl.html">GNU Free Documentation License</a></dt>
 <dd>
-<p>The GNU FDL is recommended for textbooks and teaching
+The GNU FDL is recommended for textbooks and teaching
 materials for all topics.  ("Documentation" simply means textbooks and
 other teaching materials for using equipment or software.)  We also
 recommend the GNU FDL for dictionaries, encyclopedias, and any other
 works that provide information for practical use.
-</p></dd>
+<p></p></dd>
 
 
 <dt><a href="/licenses/dsl.html">Design Science License</a></dt>
 <dd>
-<p>This is a free and copyleft license meant for general data.
+This is a free and copyleft license meant for general data.
 Please don't use it for software or documentation, since it is
 incompatible with the GNU GPL and with the GNU FDL; however, it is
 fine to use for other kinds of data.
-</p></dd>
+<p></p></dd>
 
 
 <dt><a href="http://artlibre.org/licence/lalgb.html">Free Art License</a></dt>
 <dd>
-<p>This is a free and copyleft license meant for artistic works.  It
+This is a free and copyleft license meant for artistic works.  It
 permits commercial distribution, but any larger work including the
 copylefted work must be free.
-</p></dd>
+<p></p></dd>
 
 
 <dt><a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/legalcode">Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 2.0 license</a></dt>
 <dd>
-<p>This is a copyleft Free license for artistic works and entertainment
+This is a copyleft Free license for artistic works and entertainment
 works (but not including anything of a functional nature, such as
-software). </p></dd>
+software).
+<p></p></dd>
 
 
 <dt><a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/legalcode">Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 license</a></dt>
 <dd>
-<p>This is a non-copyleft Free license for artistic works and entertainment
+This is a non-copyleft Free license for artistic works and entertainment
 works (but not including anything of a functional nature, such as
-software). </p></dd>
+software).
+<p></p></dd>
 
 
@@ -1365,5 +1367,5 @@
 <!-- All pages on the GNU web server should have the section about    -->
 <!-- verbatim copying.  Please do NOT remove this without talking     -->
-<!-- with the webmasters first. --> 
+<!-- with the webmasters first. -->
 <!-- Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the document -->
 <!-- and that it is like this "2001, 2002" not this "2001-2002." -->
@@ -1436,5 +1438,5 @@
 Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2005/01/06 17:36:03 $ $Author: novalis $
+$Date: 2005/01/09 00:43:41 $ $Author: pbrunier $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>