Re: revised two-level bitmap fdalloc diff

enami tsugutomo <[email protected]> Thu, 30 Oct 2003 00:45:19 +0900 (JST)

Newsgroups	gmane.os.netbsd.devel.performance
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

- Does the gcc optimize the 2nd find_next_zero() call (i.e., call for
  lomap) well?  Anyway, I guess it is better to factor out the code to
  pick up available bit in given 32bit word, and use it directly for
  lomap search.

- Was the choise of `a bit not set' to describe unused descriptor
  better than `a bit set' to describe it?

enami.