Re: revised two-level bitmap fdalloc diff

enami tsugutomo <[email protected]> Thu, 30 Oct 2003 00:48:40 +0900 (JST)

Newsgroups	gmane.os.netbsd.devel.performance
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

> if it's your intent,
> fdexpand() shouldn't do malloc() unless nfiles > 1024 and
> tests in fdcopy() and fdfree() are wrong.

NDHISLOTS() steps up at 1024 boundary, doesn't it?

enami.

lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.