Re: missing license?
Aleksej Saushev <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.devel.pkgsrc.wip.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Fredrik Pettai <[email protected]> writes: > On 11/10/09 11:06 PM, Larson, Timothy E. wrote: >>> How does it differ from new BSD? >> >> I guess the terms are substantially the same as the 3-clause version, except that the copyright isn't to UCBerkeley, etc etc. > > You can use this in the Makefile, which I do for missing licenses > > LICENSE= xxx-license > LICENSE_FILE= ${FILESDIR}/xxx-license > > (and add the licens to the files directory for that package) Common opinion is using "modified-bsd" for all BSD licences where terms are equivalent and only copyright holder differs. -- HE CE3OH... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july