Re: missing license?
Greg Troxel <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.devel.pkgsrc.wip.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Aleksej Saushev <[email protected]> writes: > Fredrik Pettai <[email protected]> writes: > >> On 11/10/09 11:06 PM, Larson, Timothy E. wrote: >>>> How does it differ from new BSD? >>> >>> I guess the terms are substantially the same as the 3-clause version, except that the copyright isn't to UCBerkeley, etc etc. >> >> You can use this in the Makefile, which I do for missing licenses >> >> LICENSE= xxx-license >> LICENSE_FILE= ${FILESDIR}/xxx-license >> >> (and add the licens to the files directory for that package) > > Common opinion is using "modified-bsd" for all BSD licences where terms > are equivalent and only copyright holder differs. Definitely. LICENSE= is meant to denote the terms, not who holds copyright. If we did that we'd need a fancier filesystem to hold all the license files.... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ pkgsrc-wip-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pkgsrc-wip-discuss
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 194 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (NetBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkr6E30ACgkQ+vesoDJhHiWHRQCeKZVtKnVo1CZ5cVOwheel64q1 0s4AnR9ZMl/wPd7ZmG0nCNgGPIqdglNy =fsGU -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----