Re: CVS commit: pkgsrc/net/ocamlnet
Benny Siegert <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.devel.pkgsrc.wip.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAN+FjHMye_s=jExK19ik7OrLLdgK7Tc7Anox5M87rNkfWtvpgw@mail.gmail.com> |
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Greg Troxel <[email protected]> wrote: >> I think that's the right thing to do (all people with push access). Agreed. > most people don't maintain lots of unpushed state Why not? This would be (for me) one of the main advantages of using git. > we don't have a lot of branches, perhaps none, and probably no > branches without discussion Why not allow individual branches while somebody is working on, say, updating a particular port? > After you do all that, I don't see what we gain (other than leaving > sourceforge). The ability to do sensible local committing before pushing back your changes sounds compelling to me. --Benny. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/