RE: CVS commit: pkgsrc/net/ocamlnet

Tim Larson <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.netbsd.devel.pkgsrc.wip.general
Message-ID <9275ABF8DE5D5442BECB826FC503A97601A3213EC2@DFW1MBX20.mex07a.mlsrvr.com>
> But it requires a great deal of git-fu.
[…]
> (It seems obvious to me that git is the only
> reasonable choice these days, but perhaps that's not the common view
> here.)

Personally I don't see anything wrong with svn.  Some think the distributed model is a huge benefit, but with a HA svn server and hot backup in a DR site, I don't see much practical difference. 

But then, I'm in the subset of devs that's been using cvs/svn forever, with not much git-fu.  I've tried to wrap my head around the mindset, but I just don't "get" git.

Tim
-- 
Tim Larson                                          402.933.0638?
Software Engineer                                  RemitPro, Inc.
The check isn't in the mail…                        402.861.0005?
               …it's already in the bank.           877.861.0005?


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.