RE: CVS commit: pkgsrc/net/ocamlnet
Tim Larson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.devel.pkgsrc.wip.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <9275ABF8DE5D5442BECB826FC503A97601A3213EC2@DFW1MBX20.mex07a.mlsrvr.com> |
> But it requires a great deal of git-fu.
[…]
> (It seems obvious to me that git is the only
> reasonable choice these days, but perhaps that's not the common view
> here.)
Personally I don't see anything wrong with svn. Some think the distributed model is a huge benefit, but with a HA svn server and hot backup in a DR site, I don't see much practical difference.
But then, I'm in the subset of devs that's been using cvs/svn forever, with not much git-fu. I've tried to wrap my head around the mindset, but I just don't "get" git.
Tim
--
Tim Larson 402.933.0638?
Software Engineer RemitPro, Inc.
The check isn't in the mail… 402.861.0005?
…it's already in the bank. 877.861.0005?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/