Re: please review wip/cacti-spine

"OBATA Akio" <[email protected]> Mon, 29 Jul 2013 17:03:56 +0900
Newsgroups gmane.os.netbsd.devel.pkgsrc.wip.review
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi,

On Mon, 29 Jul 2013 16:48:22 +0900, Nils Ratusznik <[email protected]> wrote:

>> > DISTFILES=              ${DISTNAME}${EXTRACT_SUFX}
>>
>> You can use ${DEFAULT_DISTFILE} instead.
>
> It breaks the build. This looks linked to the manpage and its patch.

Oh, sorry for my mess, it should be ${DEFAULT_DISTFILES}.

>> > DISTFILES+=             spine.1.gz
>> > SITES.spine.1.gz=       \
>> >        http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages.gz/precise/man1/
>>
>> Is it useful for other tha Ubuntu?
>> We are not neither Debian nor Ubuntu,
>> so man pages for all commands are not required.
>
> I added this manpage after a pkglint run. Since there is no man page in spine's archive, I took the manpage where it is.
> Should I remove the man page and ignore future messages from pkglint about it ?

It is harmless warnings, so please ignore it if manpages are not provided by upstream.
(for example, category mismatch should be fixed, i.e. bin/command & man/man8/command.8)

>> > USE_TOOLS+=     autoconf autoheader automake aclocal
>>
>> I cannot find where such auto tools are used.
>>
>> > BUILD_DEPENDS+= automake-[0-9]*:../../devel/automake
>>
>> It will not be required, already in USE_TOOLS.
>
> I removed these 2 lines from the Makefile, and the package still builds :-)
>
> Thank you very much for your review !

Thanks for your packaging!

-- 
OBATA Akio / [email protected]

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics
Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics
Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds.
Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk