Re: Wireguard interface on RPI evbarm

John Klos <[email protected]> Fri, 1 May 2026 17:08:18 +0000 (UTC)
Newsgroups gmane.os.netbsd.ports.arm
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> Mine is CG-NAT + dynamic IP. I haven't tried, but there are settings to
> forward port, so I guess incoming is allowed.

So no IPv6?

> I can possibly run Wireguard endpoint on Pi. But would I need DDNS to work
> around the dynamic IP?

That depends heavily on how often your IP changes. Some of my residential 
dynamic IPs barely change once a year. Things that are behind CG-NAT, 
though, can change every hour.

> My current attempt involved making a VPS with static IP The end point.
> With some UDP hole punching, I was hoping to reduce the latency between
> the peers, with some way to reduce P2P latency such as UDP Hole punching.
> (VPS to either peer has high latency, peer to peer has low latency.)

That's tough. Peer to peer is really tough behind CG-NAT. I'd love to hear 
what works for you.

John