Re: Wireguard interface on RPI evbarm
John Klos <[email protected]> Fri, 1 May 2026 17:08:18 +0000 (UTC)
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.ports.arm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> Mine is CG-NAT + dynamic IP. I haven't tried, but there are settings to > forward port, so I guess incoming is allowed. So no IPv6? > I can possibly run Wireguard endpoint on Pi. But would I need DDNS to work > around the dynamic IP? That depends heavily on how often your IP changes. Some of my residential dynamic IPs barely change once a year. Things that are behind CG-NAT, though, can change every hour. > My current attempt involved making a VPS with static IP The end point. > With some UDP hole punching, I was hoping to reduce the latency between > the peers, with some way to reduce P2P latency such as UDP Hole punching. > (VPS to either peer has high latency, peer to peer has low latency.) That's tough. Peer to peer is really tough behind CG-NAT. I'd love to hear what works for you. John