Re: Bebox revives
KIYOHARA Takashi <[email protected]> Sat, 23 Feb 2008 22:22:34 +0900 (JST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.ports.bebox,gmane.os.netbsd.ports.powerpc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi! Tim, From: Tim Rightnour <[email protected]> Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 23:47:21 -0700 (MST) > One other thing I'd like to see tackled at some point is this: > > Boot: Loading in() > 2450540+108504 [159648+155056]=0x2bdd88 > start=0x3100 > > It would be ideal if we could get the start address up to 0x100000 like the > other OEA ports. (I would like to use the space between 0x3000 and 0x100000 > for millicode stuff eventually) I succeeded to boot at 0x100000. Index: std.bebox =================================================================== RCS file: /cvsroot/src/sys/arch/bebox/conf/std.bebox,v retrieving revision 1.15 diff -u -r1.15 std.bebox --- std.bebox 8 Feb 2008 16:53:34 -0000 1.15 +++ std.bebox 23 Feb 2008 13:12:39 -0000 @@ -14,5 +14,3 @@ options PIC_I8259 options INTSTK=0x2000 - -makeoptions TEXTADDR=0x3100 By the way, boot ROM of bebox uses the vicinity of 0x3000. For instance, it uses it for information on the memory etc. Therefore, we were loading to 0x3100. Thanks, -- kiyohara