Re: Bebox revives

KIYOHARA Takashi <[email protected]> Sat, 23 Feb 2008 22:22:34 +0900 (JST)
Newsgroups gmane.os.netbsd.ports.bebox,gmane.os.netbsd.ports.powerpc
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi! Tim,


From: Tim Rightnour <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 23:47:21 -0700 (MST)

> One other thing I'd like to see tackled at some point is this:
> 
> Boot: Loading in()
> 2450540+108504 [159648+155056]=0x2bdd88
> start=0x3100
> 
> It would be ideal if we could get the start address up to 0x100000 like the
> other OEA ports.  (I would like to use the space between 0x3000 and 0x100000
> for millicode stuff eventually)

I succeeded to boot at 0x100000.


Index: std.bebox
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/src/sys/arch/bebox/conf/std.bebox,v
retrieving revision 1.15
diff -u -r1.15 std.bebox
--- std.bebox   8 Feb 2008 16:53:34 -0000       1.15
+++ std.bebox   23 Feb 2008 13:12:39 -0000
@@ -14,5 +14,3 @@
 options                PIC_I8259
 
 options        INTSTK=0x2000
-
-makeoptions    TEXTADDR=0x3100


By the way, boot ROM of bebox uses the vicinity of 0x3000.  For instance,
it uses it for information on the memory etc.  Therefore, we were loading
to 0x3100. 

Thanks,
--
kiyohara