Re: Address space limit?
Chris Hanson <[email protected]> Fri, 7 Jun 2019 10:04:59 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.ports.hp300,gmane.os.netbsd.ports.m68k |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Jun 7, 2019, at 9:57 AM, Chris Hanson <[email protected]> wrote:= >=20 > On Jun 7, 2019, at 9:28 AM, John Klos <[email protected]> wrote: >>=20 >> Going forward with 9.0, what should we do with 4K versus 8K platforms? Tw= o sets of binaries seems like a bad idea. >=20 > Can jemalloc be fixed to just obtain the page size of the currently runnin= g system? It doesn=E2=80=99t seem like having it be a compile time constant w= ould really be that advantageous. It looks like this is also a jemalloc issue being discussed on port-sandpoin= t; sandpoint uses a couple specific PowerPC CPUs with fixed page sizes, but o= ther PowerPC-based systems may use a different page size. =E2=80=94 Chris