Re: cmake stuck on mips
"Maciej W. Rozycki" <[email protected]> Tue, 29 Jul 2025 23:23:21 +0100 (BST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.ports.mips.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 16 Jul 2025, Havard Eidnes wrote: > > Have they ever been offered in the first place? > > Possibly not. > > It requires a certain combination of "first-hand knowledge of > what those diffs do", "ability to possibly modify them to be > applicable and acceptable upstream", "personal time and energy to > see this through", "willingness to jump through any hoops > required to be able to contribute code to the GCC project", and > it's just possible that nobody has yet satisfied all those > preconditions. I was just (implicitly) bemoaning that. Completely understood. The amount of effort required to get an upstream submission through may seem overwhelming for a newcomer, but local patch maintenance usually turns out costlier long-term. Also the GCC community is perhaps the friendliest ever nowadays towards new people. And one needn't do copyright paperwork with FSF anymore if they are not happy with that; a DCO will do. See <https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GettingStarted> for how to start. > > If they're specific to the NetBSD configuration, then they should get > > accepted right away, as long as basic stuff such as code formatting is > > correct, as it's NetBSD developers who are the experts here after all. > > > > If they apply to generic MIPS stuff or the middle end, then things may > > be a bit more involving, and in particular there has been no active MIPS > > GCC port maintainer recently. But things can be sorted regardless, as > > long as they get actually posted. There are people on the gcc-patches > > mailing list who have MIPS experience, myself including, and for the > > middle end we have active general maintainers. > > Understood. > > I'm just hoping someone could take this up as a challenge -- a > "worthy cause" so to speak, as it ideally ought to reduce our own > maintenance burden when new gcc versions are to be integrated > into our own code base. Precisely! I can see we're on the same page then. Good luck! Maciej