Re: 10.1 is working on a SGI Challenge S

On Wed, 7 Jan 2026 at 10:01, Tim McIntosh <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > On Jan 7, 2026, at 12:20=E2=80=AFPM, George Harvey <[email protected]=
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 07 Jan 2026 13:24:35 +0000
> > Jonathan Chapman <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> I cross-build most of the packages I use on a NetBSD/AMD64 VM and nati=
ve build...mostly only Perl I think. `pkgsrc` has you covered with crossbui=
ld support out of the box. Might be nice to have a coordinated effort to ma=
ke binary packages available somewhere though.
> >
> > I'm also considering the cross-build route. I had look for binary packa=
ges after completing the install and they're not available for sgimips.
>
> I had a fairly large number of packages (from circa 2012) installed on th=
e system I was trying to upgrade last year. I tried the cross-build route (=
from macOS/arm64), but as I recall, I ended up spending numerous hours goin=
g pretty far down the rabbit hole with the web of dependencies before final=
ly giving up on it.
>
> I feel like the best approach would be to have a supported binary pkgsrc =
build available from netbsd.org. Given that binary builds for sgimips or mi=
pseb are no longer supported by pkgsrc, and that R4000 and up are 64-bit CP=
Us, I have wondered about the feasibility of using the available mips64eb p=
ackages. I noticed that there were various 64-bit kernel configurations in =
the sgimips tree, but it was unclear to what degree any of those were expec=
ted to work on systems like the Indy and Challenge S. I tried to build a 64=
-bit configuration for the Challenge S last year, but it was ultimately not=
 successful in getting it to work.
>
> Just wondering whether anyone else has already considered or attempted th=
is.

I've not yet had any success building/booting 64 bit userland/kernels
for the o2/indy. :( I haven't gotten to that yet.

What's needed to get supported pkgsrc 32 bit sgimips stuff going?



-adrian

>
> Thanks!
> Tim
>