Re: SNI RM400
Michael Engel <[email protected]> Tue, 12 Nov 2002 09:51:51 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.ports.mips |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tuesday, November 12, 2002, at 01:56 AM, Toru Nishimura wrote: >> A very quick look at Linux suggests that the RM200 is an ARC-style >> machine. I have no idea how different an RM400 is, but maybe these >> can be shoe-horned into NetBSD/arc? > > Is it sure the Siemens has MIPEL? I have such an impression that > SINIX is a RISCos descendant, the MIPSEB. SINIX on Siemens RM machines is definitely big endian (Siemens also offered a - little endian, of course - Sinix version for x86-based machines as well as the NS32k-based MX300). The big-endian RM-series firmware looks quite similar to SGI-style firmware IIRC. At least older versions of it could only boot ECOFF files. You could flash RM200s and RM400s with little-endian ARC-compliant firmware in order to boot NT. The early RM200 Linux ports required little-endian operation. I have a RM200 as well as two RM400s (the EISA variants, not the more recent RMx00C PCI-based machines) and worked a bit on the Linux ports to these machines, so I could lend a hand in porting NetBSD. regards, Michael Engel ([email protected])