Re: U2 + hme...
Michael <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.ports.sparc64 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, On May 18, 2011, at 6:02 PM, Martin S. Weber wrote: > I've noticed the messages about hme0 and sparc64, but I think > i have a slightly different problem: > When booting up, my hme0 of my ultra2 is gone. dhclient says > something along the lines of hme0 - doesn't exist but then > lateron when I get to log in into the box, hme0 is there and > a manual /etc/rc.d/dhclient (re)start works just fine. I've > tried giving it some time via rc.local, but that won't help. > I need the box to just boot (tm) and DTRT (tm) w/o console > interference.... Does this sound familiar to anybody? > Note that I do have netbsd 5.1 kernel AND userland in sync > installed on the box. The kernel (and userland) is right > off the netbsd ftp server, so I doubt (but haven't checked > yet) that COMPAT_50 is absent. Hmm, I never had any trouble with hmes ( PCI and SBus variants on sparc64, SBus one on sparc ) - I don't use DHCP though. Does the U2 behave any different if you give it a static IP? have fun Michael -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin) iQEVAwUBTdRJyMpnzkX8Yg2nAQKo+Qf/XGC4QpIPUzaKS9CzY6JOUzwc1P05BC5D gM+sAzrfuYyrmI7imuBObwpzQzVGJ10ojrJzHDJCOA6S/vaKg7YKyAMkNHzlMQJ/ DEK7PMNMr50GWshe/m/d7OaX/EOwL2dUyTYHmlvojxUZsKwahH2W/tVQYRWD+XRS aOTSiniKmqovqqAzvHyxuhjx9ZzCBU639ow+SedvrYfTknDZxRD6s6xTlBMnMlDY w773FAHlTK3rg3TvxoOTtoAH6hgMny2qy0SYppjpoupIdhBgcDLCRjhzd8vuM5Xf Ix+gNBIcyvn2g5hrI5PqOuTWsc+l5+f3TZFEW4A01juwi0sQs403RA== =tYKt -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----