Re: Re2: Scheduler

On 2007-10-19 at 21:03:47 [+0200], [email protected] wrote:
[...]
> In a nutshell: I'm completely anal about my code and would like it to
> be in a shape that won't ashame me; I would have committed a broken
> scheduler were I to hold on to my previous effort; I changed the
> approach and now I'm coding for it; it's easier to grasp now; I'll do
> a final blog post before committing the code.

If my participation in this project has taught me one thing, then it is that 
open and iterative approaches usually work best. I'd rather have a 
suboptimal, incomplete solution in the repository than ten almost finished 
perfect solutions on someone's harddisk. And small commits increase the 
chance that others actual read through the changes and might discover bugs 
or propose improvements that might save you hours of time.

Oh, and everyone has written code that sucks. Really! :-)

> Do we have a deal? :)

Well, whatever you think works best for you... :-)

CU, Ingo

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/