Re: Re2: Scheduler

On 10/20/07, Ingo Weinhold <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 2007-10-19 at 21:03:47 [+0200], [email protected] wrote:
> [...]
> > In a nutshell: I'm completely anal about my code and would like it to
> > be in a shape that won't ashame me; I would have committed a broken
> > scheduler were I to hold on to my previous effort; I changed the
> > approach and now I'm coding for it; it's easier to grasp now; I'll do
> > a final blog post before committing the code.
>
> If my participation in this project has taught me one thing, then it is that
> open and iterative approaches usually work best. I'd rather have a
> suboptimal, incomplete solution in the repository than ten almost finished
> perfect solutions on someone's harddisk. And small commits increase the
> chance that others actual read through the changes and might discover bugs
> or propose improvements that might save you hours of time.
>
I totally agree with Ingo! :-)

-- 
Salvatore Benedetto (a.k.a. emitrax)
Student of Computer and Telecommunications Engineering
University of Messina (Italy)
www.messinalug.org

Please do not send me any word, excel or power point file
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/