Re: RBTree implementation and thread structure

On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 11:25 AM, Axel Dörfler <[email protected]> wrote:
>  I wouldn't mind either - having two good schedulers to choose from is
>  definitely better than having no option :-)
>  I wouldn't mind if both would follow a different approach, though.
>  Looking at FreeBSD benchmarks, the CFS performs rather poorly in
>  comparison (well, not to our current one, anyway).

I'm a big fan of Jeff's work as well :)

Anyway, I'd rather go the "cooperation" route than the "competition"
route. Of course, this is just the way *I* feel about this; if one
wishes to crush me, be my guest :D

Salvo, I have you on my Google Talk list. Maybe we should chat about it? :)


Cheers,
A.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone