Re: RBTree implementation an d thread structure

"André Braga" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Anyway, I'd rather go the "cooperation" route than the "competition"
> route. Of course, this is just the way *I* feel about this; if one
> wishes to crush me, be my guest :D

Cooperation would definitely be nice - but I would still welcome if it 
results in more than one scheduler (if only to have a clear winner in 
benchmarks) :-)

"Rene Gollent" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm curious, do you have a link for those benchmarks?

See http://people.freebsd.org/~kris/scaling/7.0%20Preview.pdf for 
example. Of course, that might not be a benchmark we want to excel in :
-)

Bye,
   Axel.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone