Re: Wireguard doesn't seem to work on macppc 7.8

On May 14, 2026 9:43:33 AM GMT+02:00, Alexandr Nedvedicky <[email protected]> wrote:
>Hello,
>On Thu, May 14, 2026 at 08:30:02AM +0200, Gabriele Vento wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> On May 14, 2026 12:48:03 AM GMT+02:00, Vitaliy Makkoveev <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >On Wed, May 13, 2026 at 08:54:24AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>> >> Is this a byte order problem?
>> >> 
>> >
>> >I just check wg(4) on my Powerbook G4. Everything works fine. It runs
>> >"OpenBSD 7.9 (GENERIC) #54: Fri May  8" but I'm pretty sure 7.8 should
>> >also work fine.
>> >
>> >Gabriele, what do yo mean saying "just doesn't work"? Does it failed to
>> >connect to the peer or does it successfully connect, but traffic does
>> >not go within tunnel?
>> Traffic does not go within the tunnel.
>> 
>
>    can you share output of `ifconfig wg` for both tunnel ends?
On my end it is outputs
    wg0: flags=80c3<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,NOARP,MULTICAST> mtu 1300
        description: ...
        index 8 priority 0 llprio 3
        wgport 22670
        wgpubkey ...
        wgpeer ...
            wgpsk (present)
            wgpka 15 (sec)
            wgendpoint 15.204.55.83 42070
            tx: 7844, rx: 0
            wgaip 15.204.55.83/10
        groups: wg
        inet ... netmask 0xffffffff

For the other end of the tunnel, I do not own that endpoint so I cannot provide the output.
>    optionally content of /etc/hostname.wgX on both endpoints.
My system does not appear to possess that file.

>    Make sure to redact/remove any keys for tunnel.  I suspect
>    there might be issue with wgaip settings which Stuart mentioned.
>
>    also if you can check output of
>        route get $IP_address_reached_over_tunnel
>    command should help us to tell the routing works as expected,
>    you can use remote tunnel peer's address.
Sure, here is the output:
    route to: 15.204.55.83
    destination: 0.0.0.0
    mask: 0.0.0.0
    gateway: 10.34.116.212
    interface: gem0
    if address: 10.34.116.145
    priority: 8 (static)
    flags: <UP,GATEWAY,DONE,STATIC>
    label: dhcpleased
    use mtu expire
    39 0 0
    sockaddrs: <DST,GATEWAY,NETMASK,IFP,IFA,LABEL>
>
>    also any chance pf(4) drops traffic for wg-tunnel?
I do not know how to check this, I read through tcpdump /var/log/pflog but it only outputs a single line:
    tcpdump: WARNING: snaplen raised from 116 to 160.
>thanks and
>regards
>sashan
>