Re: ie(4) v.s. dhcpd(8) & tcpdump(8)

Making, drinking tea and reading an opus magnum from Brian A. Seklecki:
> I checked the list archives and didn't see anything obvious related to
> this.

it was fixed already in -current.

cu

> When I run tcpdump(8) on the ie(4) on my 712/60 running the -current
> snapshot from last month, i see absolutely no traffic printed to stdout.
> 
> shackled# tcpdump -i ie0 -n
> tcpdump: listening on ie0
> 
> # ifconfig ie0
> ie0: flags=8963<UP,BROADCAST,NOTRAILERS,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST>
> mtu 1500
>         address: 08:00:09:5a:11:1e
>         media: Ethernet 10base2
>         inet 192.168.1.1 netmask 0xfffffff0 broadcast 192.168.1.15
>         inet6 fe80::a00:9ff:fe5a:111e%ie0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1
>         inet 162.33.85.74 netmask 0xffffffc0 broadcast 162.33.85.127
> 
> The "PROMISC" flag is definately getting set, I'm just not seeing packets.
> I tried using an AUI adapter on the 15 pin 10base5 port exclusively, the
> UTP port exclusively, and a combination of both.
> 
> Here's the dmesg(8) output:
> 
> ie0 at gsc0 offset 7000 irq 8: LASI/i82596CA v1.0, address
> 08:00:09:5a:11:1e
> 
> Also, probably related in some way, dhcpd(8) wont' run.  netstat(1) shows
> it listening, but no queries come through when i run it w/ the -d flag.
> and of course, w/o a working tcpdump(8), it's kind of hard to debug the
> problem.
> 
> Also, ifconfig(8) -m on ie0 shows 10base2 ?! as the only available media.
> That can't be right.  I'd try a more recent -current if i had a good
> cross-compile platform.
> 
> Any insight?
> 
> l8*
> 	-lava
> 
> x.25 - minix - bitnet - plan9 - 110 bps - ASR 33 - base8
> 


-- 
    paranoic mickey       (my employers have changed but, the name has remained)