Re: ie(4) v.s. dhcpd(8) & tcpdump(8)

On Mon, 25 Aug 2003, Michael Shalayeff wrote:

> Making, drinking tea and reading an opus magnum from Brian A. Seklecki:
> > I checked the list archives and didn't see anything obvious related to
> > this.
>
> it was fixed already in -current.
>
> cu

alright, then.  i'll build a -current kernel and test it (i'm assuming no
userland utils need updated, per the cvs commit messages applicable to
src/sys/arch/hppa/gsc/if_ie_gsc.c)

i notice someone uploaded a newer snapshot into
"/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/hppa" .. i'm assuming these are from the -current
branch? The uname(1) is kind of vague, it still says 3.3 (i'm used to the
NetBSD release engineering schedule which uses a naming scheme in vers.h)

-lava

>
> > When I run tcpdump(8) on the ie(4) on my 712/60 running the -current
> > snapshot from last month, i see absolutely no traffic printed to stdout.
> >
> > shackled# tcpdump -i ie0 -n
> > tcpdump: listening on ie0
> >
> > # ifconfig ie0
> > ie0: flags=8963<UP,BROADCAST,NOTRAILERS,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST>
> > mtu 1500
> >         address: 08:00:09:5a:11:1e
> >         media: Ethernet 10base2
> >         inet 192.168.1.1 netmask 0xfffffff0 broadcast 192.168.1.15
> >         inet6 fe80::a00:9ff:fe5a:111e%ie0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1
> >         inet 162.33.85.74 netmask 0xffffffc0 broadcast 162.33.85.127
> >
> > The "PROMISC" flag is definately getting set, I'm just not seeing packets.
> > I tried using an AUI adapter on the 15 pin 10base5 port exclusively, the
> > UTP port exclusively, and a combination of both.
> >
> > Here's the dmesg(8) output:
> >
> > ie0 at gsc0 offset 7000 irq 8: LASI/i82596CA v1.0, address
> > 08:00:09:5a:11:1e
> >
> > Also, probably related in some way, dhcpd(8) wont' run.  netstat(1) shows
> > it listening, but no queries come through when i run it w/ the -d flag.
> > and of course, w/o a working tcpdump(8), it's kind of hard to debug the
> > problem.
> >
> > Also, ifconfig(8) -m on ie0 shows 10base2 ?! as the only available media.
> > That can't be right.  I'd try a more recent -current if i had a good
> > cross-compile platform.
> >
> > Any insight?
> >
> > l8*
> > 	-lava
> >
> > x.25 - minix - bitnet - plan9 - 110 bps - ASR 33 - base8
> >
>
>
> --
>     paranoic mickey       (my employers have changed but, the name has remained)
>

l8*
	-lava

x.25 - minix - bitnet - plan9 - 110 bps - ASR 33 - base8