Re: CodeWarrior copy, was Re: mac68k install process

AFAIK, .pi files were tyipcal of Think C and Think Pascal (oh, good old
days)...

I should have CW PRO3 and maybe even some older version. And a Smantec
C++ which runs on PPC only but should target 68k as well.

if I should dig up these and look for them, let me know in private. Some
are for sure legal copies I purchased, other might be not. So...

In any case, instead of pursuing the installer maze, I would propose to
follow the NetBSD way: use a standard installer for ever arch. So only
the booter has to be mantained (which we share anyway?)

-Riccardo

Randy Darden wrote:
> 
> --- Frank Garcia <[email protected]> wrote:
> > You can get MPW for free if you want a compiler that will work, but the
> > sources were created in CodeWarrior, and linked against CW libraries
> > ... and I couldn't even find the right version on ebay, certainly not
> > on the vendor website.
> 
>    The "README.COMPILER" file says THINK C 7.0.4, but it does have a
> dot-"pi" file, which I thought was CodeWarrior. If anyone is interested, I
> have a copy of CodeWarrior Pro 5 Academic that's been gathering dust for
> years. I think I had a copy of Pro 3 but my girlfriend "inspired" me to do
> a little cleaning a few months back.
>    Ah, CodeWarrior. I think I'll have to fire it up for old time's sake.
> The summer when I learned pointers in my first C class, rebooting the Mac
> every time I ran my code because the whole machine would go down. I've been
> away from programming for too long.