Re: X11 problems
Riccardo Mottola <[email protected]> Sat, 7 May 2005 08:30:06 +0000 (UTC)
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.openbsd.mac68k |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello, > no color. > No grey scale. > 1 bit per pixel. this is really a pity. Linux does full color. Netbsd has a working color server but the people who wrote it are lost so there are copyright problems with the code and it cannot be merged in the official tree, a real pity. (At least I understood the matter this way). > yep. Got a Q610 myself. Works well... > Quadra 650 is probably most popular with developers, and my Quadra 840av > is wickedly un-pathetically slow (no, just couldn't get myself to say > "fast" there. It isn't fast). My Quadra 900 takes up way too much space. Well, the q840 is really fast under macOS and udner linux it is quite decent too. But under netbsd I ran often a race against the q610 and it loosed every time I/O was involed. At netbsd 1.6 times the dma use on the 610 was better and it ended being the fastest machine for 68k I had for general usage. Well, the q840 I used shortly for netbsd had the advantage of accepting easily 128MB of ram and has indeed a faster cpu, so for compiling it ended being better. I have never tried openbsd though, I gather it has similarities with Netbsd in 68k support. Do you still manage to exchange code advances (if there are any). Linux supports some hardware that *BSD fails to support, although in a more or less flakey manner. Sometimes I really regret of having no knwledge at kernel-level programming, I'd like to fix some stuff myself. But well, I hope you might enjoy higher-level programs I wrote on your 68k boxen :) anyway, cheers. Riccardo