Re: FYI: backup hint

Lars Noodén <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.openbsd.misc
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 8/7/26 23:06, Eric Johnson wrote:
> One issue with using rsync as a "backup" solution is that you get a
> copy of what is currently on the server.  If you have to go back even
> just a week, much less several months, to get some specific version
> of a file from months before, you can't do that with rsync.

That's partially a difference between openrsync(1) and rsync(1) but more 
about how you have scripted their use.  Point the destination at a 
different target directory each day (or other interval) and you can go 
back at least a little, depending on how deep that stack is and how much 
space you have on the storage device being used for backup.

In old rsync(1) you also have --link-dest which allows you to save space 
on the destination partition by using hard links on the target partition 
for files in a new backup directory which have not changed relative to 
the reference directory.  The big tradeoff with --link-dest is that 
there ends up being only a single copy on that particular partition. 
But if you're only using openrsync(1) then --link-dest is not relevant.

However, since you do have multiple backup media anyway, those multiple 
devices should be part of the rotation strategy / calculations.

/Lars
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.