Re: FW: Address pools

"Rod Whitworth" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.openbsd.www
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Wrong mailing list.
See http://www.openbsd.org/mail.html


On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 10:02:17 +0800, Joel wrote:

>Hi!
>
> 
>
>With the example of pf rules on http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/pools.html its
>not working for me.
>
> 
>
>lan_net = "192.168.0.0/24"
>
>int_if  = "dc0"
>
>ext_if1 = "fxp0"
>
>ext_if2 = "fxp1"
>
>ext_gw1 = "68.146.224.1"
>
>ext_gw2 = "142.59.76.1"
>
> 
>
>#  nat outgoing connections on each internet interface
>
>match out on $ext_if1 from $lan_net nat-to ($ext_if1)
>
>match out on $ext_if2 from $lan_net nat-to ($ext_if2)
>
> 
>
>#  default deny
>
>block in
>
>block out
>
> 
>
>#  pass all outgoing packets on internal interface
>
>pass out on $int_if to $lan_net
>
>#  pass in quick any packets destined for the gateway itself
>
>pass in quick on $int_if from $lan_net to $int_if
>
>#  load balance outgoing traffic from internal network. 
>
>pass in on $int_if from $lan_net \
>
>    route-to { ($ext_if1 $ext_gw1), ($ext_if2 $ext_gw2) } \
>
>    round-robin
>
>#  keep https traffic on a single connection; some web applications,
>
>#  especially "secure" ones, don't allow it to change mid-session
>
>pass in on $int_if proto tcp from $lan_net to port https \
>
>    route-to ($ext_if1 $ext_gw1)
>
> 
>
>#  general "pass out" rules for external interfaces
>
>pass out on $ext_if1
>
>pass out on $ext_if2
>
> 
>
>#  route packets from any IPs on $ext_if1 to $ext_gw1 and the same for
>
>#  $ext_if2 and $ext_gw2
>
>pass out on $ext_if1 from $ext_if2 route-to ($ext_if2 $ext_gw2)
>
>pass out on $ext_if2 from $ext_if1 route-to ($ext_if1 $ext_gw1) 
>
> 
>
> 
>
>But when I put one of the gateways on /etc/mygate, my client pc can now
>connect to internet but only for that gateway that I put on /etc/mygate.  Is
>this suppose to work without the /etc/mygate file?
>
> 
>
>Joel
>

*** NOTE *** Please DO NOT CC me. I <am> subscribed to the list.
Mail to the sender address that does not originate at the list server is tarpitted. The reply-to: address is provided for those who feel compelled to reply off list. Thankyou.

Rod/
---
This life is not the real thing.
It is not even in Beta.
If it was, then OpenBSD would already have a man page for it.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.