Re: Ethereal becomes Wireshark
Mike Savory <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.opendarwin.darwinports |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Dohhh I fell for the trap of searching for the port on the web-page instead of going "port info wireshark" By the way it installed and ran fine..... Just had to "port deactivate ethereal" to remove a conflict with /opt/ local/bin/capinfos Cheers Mike On Aug 8, 2006, at 3:00 PM, Eric Hall wrote: > On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 02:33:13PM -0700, Mike Savory wrote: >>> The Ethereal packet sniffer is changing names and getting a new >> home.... >>> Wireshark. http://www.wireshark.org/ >> >> Wireshark 0.99.2 was Released Jul 17, 2006 >> >> Is anyone looking at upgrading/replacing the current Ethereal port ?? >> >> The Wireshark 0.99.2 fixes some security issues over the last >> ethereal 0.99.0, Revision 1 that is in the current portfile. >> >> Is there a way of coping with a port that changes name? should there >> just be a new port for Wireshark. how about invalidating the old >> ethereal port (with a UI_message to says its been replaced by >> wireshark....) >> > > The wireshark port was added 2 weeks ago.... > > Ethereal will get some sort of notice that wireshark exists, > haven't decided how that will happen yet. > > > -eric > > _______________________________________________ > Darwinports mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.opendarwin.org/mailman/listinfo/darwinports >