Re: any reasons to recompile kernel?

Graham J Lee <[email protected]> Fri, 22 Jul 2005 09:13:38 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.os.opendarwin.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 22 Jul 2005, at 06:49, Maurice Ling wrote:

> Having said that, had anyone actually done that (building and  
> replacing a new kernel into an existing OSX installation)? This is  
> commonplace in Linux, but in Darwin/OpenDarwin/OSX landscape?
>

Maybe there's someone from that project here who can fill in the  
details, but I went to a UKUUG (UK Unix Users' Group) session which  
involved a speaker from SEDarwin.  A large part of 'SE' systems is  
Mandatory Access Control, and they compile a Darwin kernel to provide  
MAC to, um, Mac.  IIRC the speaker said that you could run OS X on a  
SEDarwin layer.  So there's one reason for supplying your own kernel :-)

> Is the version of OSX determined mainly by the kernel or other tools?

The version of OS X is determined by someone in Apple product  
marketing I expect ;-).

Cheers,

Graham.
-- 
Graham Lee                       GPG Key ID: 01D5B9D8
UNIX Systems Manager, Oxford Physics Practical Course
Coordinator, UKUUG Apple SIG (http://lists.ukuug.org/mailman/listinfo/ 
apple-sig)
Technical bod, Oxford Mac Users' Group (http://www.oxmug.org)