Re: any reasons to recompile kernel?
Graham J Lee <[email protected]> Fri, 22 Jul 2005 09:13:38 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.opendarwin.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 22 Jul 2005, at 06:49, Maurice Ling wrote: > Having said that, had anyone actually done that (building and > replacing a new kernel into an existing OSX installation)? This is > commonplace in Linux, but in Darwin/OpenDarwin/OSX landscape? > Maybe there's someone from that project here who can fill in the details, but I went to a UKUUG (UK Unix Users' Group) session which involved a speaker from SEDarwin. A large part of 'SE' systems is Mandatory Access Control, and they compile a Darwin kernel to provide MAC to, um, Mac. IIRC the speaker said that you could run OS X on a SEDarwin layer. So there's one reason for supplying your own kernel :-) > Is the version of OSX determined mainly by the kernel or other tools? The version of OS X is determined by someone in Apple product marketing I expect ;-). Cheers, Graham. -- Graham Lee GPG Key ID: 01D5B9D8 UNIX Systems Manager, Oxford Physics Practical Course Coordinator, UKUUG Apple SIG (http://lists.ukuug.org/mailman/listinfo/ apple-sig) Technical bod, Oxford Mac Users' Group (http://www.oxmug.org)