Re: OpenDarwin shutting down
Christian Brunschen <[email protected]> Wed, 26 Jul 2006 14:40:06 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.opendarwin.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Jul 25, 2006, at 9:42 PM, Rob Braun wrote: > OpenDarwin was originally created with the goal of providing a > development environment for building and developing Mac OS X > sources as > well as developing a standalone Darwin OS derivative. OpenDarwin was > meant to be a development community and a proving ground for fixes and > features for Mac OS X and Darwin, which could be picked up by Apple > for > inclusion in the canonical sources. > OpenDarwin has failed to achieve its goals in 4 years of operation, > and > moves further from achieving these goals as time goes on. For this > reason, OpenDarwin will be shutting down. This is a real shame. I understand the reasons, though. However, I am slightly confused by the timing. After all, Apple's World Wide Developer Conference (WWDC), where the next version of Mac OS X (10.5, 'Leopard') will be previewed, is just around the corner - it will take place less than two weeks from now. That might have been a forum for some direct feedback into, and back out of, Apple, which might have led to perhaps improved communication between Apple and OpenDarwin (yes, unlikely but possible), or might indeed have further clarified the issues; either way, I would have thought that with WWDC so close by, it could have made sense to see if anything, positive or negative, might be derived from WWDC. Who knows, Apple might even have some Darwin-related announcements planned for WWDC, which might affect this decision. Likewise, even if any information gotten from WWDC were to only further support the decision to shut down OpenDarwin, that would have been useful extra recent background for the decision. Or, for that matter, an announcement about now, in advance of WWDC, that OpenDarwin was _considering_ closing down, might have prompted some form of response from Apple, such that at WWDC itself, a renewed commitment could be publicised - or alternatively, after WWCD, there would be a follow-up announcement that because Apple _didn't_ address the issues, the shutdown that had been considered would now take place. Now, I am aware that I am not even a contributor to OpenDarwin nor any of its related projects, just an interested bystander, and that my comments must be seen in that context. Nevertheless, any reply would be much appreciated. Best wishes, // Christian Brunschen