Re: multimple domain authentication
Micah Stetson <[email protected]> Thu, 2 Sep 2004 11:30:05 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.plan9.nine-grid |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20040902183005.GA21735@epaphras> |
> that's my point of disagreement. I'm not giving access to people not > known. If you're from [email protected], I might let you access my fossil > and I might not. If I do, you can attach it, but if not, use your fossil > from your domain. I don't see your point here at all. If you aren't giving file service access at all, then all you need is a yes/no from the auth server and a name to own the processes. That's fine. But in a system built around file-like services, I can't imagine there not being services on the grid that look like file systems. In that case, I want to be able to control remote users' access more specifically than just yes or no for all the domains the auth server trusts. I want to place remote users in local groups and possibly limit access per-domain. I think the best way for that to happen is for the file servers that care to understand the user@domain convention, and do something sensible with it. I think my original post was because I thought Andrey suggested that file servers need never know about the user@domain convention. Reading back through this thread, I'm not sure he suggested that at all. Micah