NFS mounts on Tru64 v5.1B
[email protected] Thu, 09 Sep 2010 09:31:01 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.tru64.managers |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <BC32806ED11EBB409FA518E82D1C13F0902BB7@RCOEVSCHI004.archq.ri.redcross.net> |
Hello Managers, I'm having an issue trying to attach a NAS system to my Tru64 server and I was hoping some of you might have some advice on performance issues I'm seeing. First Off; Many thanks to those of you who offered SCSI Raid cards and especially to Richard L. for sending two (2) for me to work with. =20 I'm going to be trying a dual path approach to this storage issue and the first will involve using an external ReadyNAS box hooked up via direct attached ethernet, no switches or hubs involved. We are using a 192.168.X.X for the ethernet card connected to the NAS whereas the server uses a 10.X.X.X for the ethernet card connected to the LAN. Currently, when the NAS is attached to a 100Mb ee0 card at full-duplex my performance is at about 25% - 33% vs. a direct attached external SCSI RAID subsystem. This could be the best case scenario for the system as an NFS mount at 100Mb-Full. When we attach it to a 1000Mb bgm0 card at full-duplex the performance actually decreases. At first we thought it was a crappy crossover cable due to a number of collision errors we were seeing but, upon testing, the ReadyNAS can autodetect the cable type and we used a regular ethernet cable and it worked fine. Including zero (0) collisions. Both of these ethernet cards have been in my system and running fine for quite a while. Does anyone have preferred or suggested settings for the NFS mount or the ethernet card that might help the situation? Any other issues I should be aware of or be monitoring? Again Many Thanks, Ed Notari American Red Cross [email protected]