Re: Congestion as a good thing

Pascal van den Noort <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.politics.activism.carfree-network
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Amsterdam does not have congestion charging, but it has successfully  
reduced traffic to and in the inner city by implementing three  
measures, preceded by a referendum early nineties.
Introduction of ever increasing parking rates, approaching € 5 per  
hour now; reducing the number of parking places; introducing lots of  
one way streets. The results are very good.
If desired figures can be produced by the city.


Pascal J.W. van den Noort
Executive Director Velo Mondial

http://velomondial.blogspot.com
www.velomondial.net
www.velo.info
http://spicycles.velo.info
[email protected]

+31206270675 landline
+31627055688 mobile phone










On Sep 7, 2008, at 5:28 PM, Ian Fiddies wrote:

> Hi All!
> As if I didn't have enough to do my local council in Gothenburg has  
> decided to build an new motorway tunnel under the river. I naturally  
> feel that this is a bad move but it comes as no surprise and has  
> been hovering in the air since about a year after they finished  
> present motorway tunnel under the river. I intend to do everything  
> in my power to stop the project.
>
> For some time now I have been pondering over a theory that  
> congestion is the only true limiting factor in unregulated traffic.  
> It is based on one of my fears about congestion charging. Simply  
> applying a charge to drive at certain times of the day will  
> initially reduce the congestion but this relief will soon be eaten  
> up by the financially stronger drivers driving more. In London the  
> charge has been accompanied by other measures reducing the amount of  
> road space allocated to cars mainly to the advantage of bus lanes.  
> (Good stuff Ken.) But it doesn't help me to prove my theory.
>
> Has anyone been thinking along similar lines or know of someone who  
> has? This idea seems so obvious that someone else must have already  
> done research on it. Ideally it would be best with empirical data  
> from a city that has used road space as a limiting factor to reduce  
> traffic. If a new road always generates more traffic the opposite  
> intuitively seems true. Taking away a lane will reduce traffic. Help  
> me prove this please.
>
> /Ian Fiddies
>
> Skype- ianfiddies
>
> Invite your mail contacts to join your friends list with Windows  
> Live Spaces. It's easy! Try it!
> >


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "World Carfree Network" group.
To post to this group, send email to carfree_network-/[email protected]
Replies are sent to the author of the message.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
carfree_network-unsubscribe-/[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/carfree_network?hl=en?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.