Re: Congestion as a good thing
Pascal van den Noort <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.politics.activism.carfree-network |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Amsterdam does not have congestion charging, but it has successfully reduced traffic to and in the inner city by implementing three measures, preceded by a referendum early nineties. Introduction of ever increasing parking rates, approaching € 5 per hour now; reducing the number of parking places; introducing lots of one way streets. The results are very good. If desired figures can be produced by the city. Pascal J.W. van den Noort Executive Director Velo Mondial http://velomondial.blogspot.com www.velomondial.net www.velo.info http://spicycles.velo.info [email protected] +31206270675 landline +31627055688 mobile phone On Sep 7, 2008, at 5:28 PM, Ian Fiddies wrote: > Hi All! > As if I didn't have enough to do my local council in Gothenburg has > decided to build an new motorway tunnel under the river. I naturally > feel that this is a bad move but it comes as no surprise and has > been hovering in the air since about a year after they finished > present motorway tunnel under the river. I intend to do everything > in my power to stop the project. > > For some time now I have been pondering over a theory that > congestion is the only true limiting factor in unregulated traffic. > It is based on one of my fears about congestion charging. Simply > applying a charge to drive at certain times of the day will > initially reduce the congestion but this relief will soon be eaten > up by the financially stronger drivers driving more. In London the > charge has been accompanied by other measures reducing the amount of > road space allocated to cars mainly to the advantage of bus lanes. > (Good stuff Ken.) But it doesn't help me to prove my theory. > > Has anyone been thinking along similar lines or know of someone who > has? This idea seems so obvious that someone else must have already > done research on it. Ideally it would be best with empirical data > from a city that has used road space as a limiting factor to reduce > traffic. If a new road always generates more traffic the opposite > intuitively seems true. Taking away a lane will reduce traffic. Help > me prove this please. > > /Ian Fiddies > > Skype- ianfiddies > > Invite your mail contacts to join your friends list with Windows > Live Spaces. It's easy! Try it! > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "World Carfree Network" group. To post to this group, send email to carfree_network-/[email protected] Replies are sent to the author of the message. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to carfree_network-unsubscribe-/[email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/carfree_network?hl=en?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---