congestion as a good thing

Jeroen Verhoeven <jeroen.verhoeven-octSvtrGuH/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.politics.activism.carfree-network
Organization Friends of the Earth Europe
Message-ID <[email protected]>
So if I understand well, I have been reading arguments basically saying that

    * congestion and and overdose of cars is a good tool fight the
      damage and nuisance caused by cars. So the more congestion the better?


Of course building more roads should not be the alternative to
congestion, but  I understood the discussion was about reducing the
number of cars on the road.

Is congestion better to reduce the negative impacts of cars on the
environment than reducing the number of cars on the road, even if these
fewer cars may drive a longer distance?

Looking at the increasing impact of cars on the environment over the
past decades. These impacts are still rising, together with increasing
congestion.

-- 
Jeroen Verhoeven
Car Efficiency Campaign
Friends of the Earth Europe
T: +32.2542.61.01
skype: jeroen_verhoeven (Brussels)
Mobile: +32.477.46.31.81



Manfred Treber wrote:
> I don't want to get rid of congestion.
>
> Because we have one fundamental premise - I quote from IPCC-WG3 of AR4, 
> p. 329:
>
> "Worldwide travel studies have shown that the average time budget for 
> travel is roughly constant worldwide, with
> the relative speed of travel determining distances travelled yearly 
> (Schafer, 2000)."
>
> That means if you build more roads to get rid of congestion the "saved 
> time" will be reinvested in longer distances traveled.
> Which leads to higher emissions.
>
> Best regards
>
> Manfred
>
> --------------------------------
> Manfred Treber
> Senior Adviser Climate/Transport
> Germanwatch e.V.
> Dr. Werner-Schuster-Haus
> Kaiserstr. 201
> D-53113 Bonn
>
> Tel. ++49-(0)228-60492-14, Fax -19
> http://www.germanwatch.org
>
> Magnus Nilsson schrieb:
>   
>> Emission figures for hybrids is a problem. The lowwer the emissions in
>> congested situations.
>> But we want to get rid of congestions, don´t we?
>> And when hybrids moves out of the cities they are not better than any
>> petrol car.
>> This is of course all about the test cycle.
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------
>> Magnus Nilsson
>> Trafikexpert/Transport campaigner
>>
>> Naturskyddsföreningen/Swedish Society for Nature Conservation
>> Box 4625
>> SE-116 91 Stockholm
>> www.naturskyddsforeningen.se
>>
>> Tel:            +46-(0)8-702 65 98
>> Mobil tel:    +46-(0)708-99 66 88
>> Fax            +46-(0)8-702 08 55
>>
>> E-post: [email protected]
>>
>> Så hittar du naturpärlorna i Stockholmstrakten:
>> www.utinaturen.nu
>>
>> Du är väl medlem? På vår hemsida www.snf.se kan du bli det eller så
>> klickar du här direkt 
>> http://www.snf.se/snf/medlem.cfm
>>
>>
>>
>>     
>
> >
>   

drive the future, drive down emissions. check out www.mundo-cars.eu!

-- 
Jeroen Verhoeven
Car Efficiency Campaign
Friends of the Earth Europe
T: +32.2542.61.01
skype: jeroen_verhoeven (Brussels)
Mobile: +32.477.46.31.81


drive the future, drive down emissions. check out www.mundo-cars.eu!

-- 
Jeroen Verhoeven
Car Efficiency Campaign
Friends of the Earth Europe
T: +32.2542.61.01
skype: jeroen_verhoeven (Brussels)
Mobile: +32.477.46.31.81


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "World Carfree Network" group.
To post to this group, send email to carfree_network-/[email protected]
Replies are sent to the author of the message.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
carfree_network-unsubscribe-/[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/carfree_network?hl=en?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.