Re: Democratic Socialists Further Advance

"Mark Baugher" <[email protected]> Tue, 28 Jul 2026 12:33:52 -0700
Newsgroups gmane.politics.marxism.marxmail
Message-ID <[email protected]>
--Apple-Mail=_41D8C5B8-9327-4360-AF7F-9AB019D5B397
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii



> On Jul 26, 2026, at 14:54, Dennis Brasky via groups.io <dmozart1756=3Dgma=
[email protected]> wrote:
>=20
> If the party leadership does this, they would basically be expelling the =
left, paving the way for a new party of the left,=20

The capitalist media was all atwitter this morning about this: https://www.=
foxnews.com/media/dsa-co-chair-embraces-abolishing-senate-ice-borders-democ=
ratic-infighting-escalates

"A top Democratic socialist leader on Sunday embraced abolishing the Senate=
 <https://www.foxnews.com/category/politics/elections/senate>, national bor=
ders, prisons and more, laying bare the movement's sweeping agenda as ideol=
ogical divisions within the Democratic Party <https://www.foxnews.com/categ=
ory/us/democratic-party> continue to deepen."

I think this is what would be considered part of a "far left" platform in t=
he US today, but it falls far short of a socialist program for many of the =
reasons covered by Tony and others on this list: It is top-down socialism t=
hat grants gifts to the working class in the form of reforms, however radic=
al. It is also a gift to the US "far left" who advocate abolishing the poli=
ce, the borders, the military, etc. Here "far left" means folks with the mo=
st radical demands. They don't want to reform the police or even defund the=
 police, they want to abolish the police! Same with borders and same with i=
mperialism. Give me a reform and I can give you a more radical one.

What's wrong with this is that we want the working class to collectively an=
d democratically make the decisions on policing, borders, forever wars, cor=
porate ownership and running the nation. And how do we do that?

Non-reformist reforms (Gorz), transitional demands (Trotsky), and Luxemburg=
 who wrote about "The struggle for reforms is its means; the social revolut=
ion, its goal" (https://socialistworker.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Re=
form.pdf). Their revolutionary-socialist strategies focus on reforms that i=
ncrease workers power.=20

Abolishing police as a plank in a reform platform that becomes legislation =
does nothing, by itself, to empower the people who are most affected by cri=
me in a capitalist social order of "all against all" where powerful exploit=
 powerless. Community self defense or "peace keeping" might be transitional=
, non-reformist reforms if they deepen democratic organization within the c=
ommunity and transfer power from a state entity to organized working people=
.

Mark

p.s. One final note. There is a body of contemporary work on transitional/n=
on-reformist reforms that is news to me (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-=
reformist_reform). This includes work produced by legal scholars like Amna =
Akbar (https://www.nyulawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/NYULaw-93-3-=
Akbar.pdf). I have not digested these materials yet, but the crossover is i=
nteresting regardless of the content.







-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#42685): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/42685
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/120458891/6024700
-=3D-=3D-
POSTING RULES & NOTES
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
#4 Do not exceed five posts a day.
-=3D-=3D-
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/marxmail/leave/10173629/6024700/1441833971=
/xyzzy [[email protected]]
-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-



--Apple-Mail=_41D8C5B8-9327-4360-AF7F-9AB019D5B397
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset=us-ascii

<html><head><meta http-equiv=3D"content-type" content=3D"text/html; charset=
=3Dus-ascii"></head><body style=3D"overflow-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-=
mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;"><br id=3D"lineBreakAtBeginning=
OfMessage"><div><br><blockquote type=3D"cite"><div>On Jul 26, 2026, at 14:5=
4, Dennis Brasky via groups.io &lt;[email protected]&gt; wr=
ote:</div><br class=3D"Apple-interchange-newline"><div><meta charset=3D"UTF=
-8"><span style=3D"caret-color: rgb(54, 54, 54); color: rgb(54, 54, 54); fo=
nt-family: georgia; font-size: large; font-style: normal; font-variant-caps=
: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: auto; text-ali=
gn: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; wid=
ows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-co=
lor: rgb(247, 247, 247); text-decoration: none; display: inline !important;=
 float: none;">If the party leadership does this, they would basically be e=
xpelling the left, paving the way for a new party of the left,<span class=
=3D"Apple-converted-space">&nbsp;</span></span></div></blockquote></div><br=
><div>The capitalist media was all atwitter this morning about this: https:=
//www.foxnews.com/media/dsa-co-chair-embraces-abolishing-senate-ice-borders=
-democratic-infighting-escalates</div><div><br></div><div>"A top Democratic=
 socialist leader on Sunday embraced abolishing&nbsp;<a data-omtr-intcmp=3D=
"fnc_media_article_main-content_article-body_6_1" href=3D"https://www.foxne=
ws.com/category/politics/elections/senate" target=3D"_blank" rel=3D"noopene=
r noreferrer">the Senate</a>, national borders, prisons and more, laying ba=
re the movement's sweeping agenda as ideological divisions within the&nbsp;=
<a data-omtr-intcmp=3D"fnc_media_article_main-content_article-body_6_2" hre=
f=3D"https://www.foxnews.com/category/us/democratic-party" target=3D"_blank=
" rel=3D"noopener">Democratic Party</a>&nbsp;continue to deepen."</div><div=
><br></div><div>I think this is what would be considered part of a "far lef=
t" platform in the US today, but it falls far short of a socialist program =
for many of the reasons covered by Tony and others on this list: It is top-=
down socialism that grants gifts to the working class in the form of reform=
s, however radical. It is also a gift to the US "far left" who advocate abo=
lishing the police, the borders, the military, etc. Here "far left" means f=
olks with the most radical demands. They don't want to reform the police or=
 even defund the police, they want to abolish the police! Same with borders=
 and same with imperialism. Give me a reform and I can give you a more radi=
cal one.</div><div><br></div><div>What's wrong with this is that we want th=
e working class to collectively and democratically make the decisions on po=
licing, borders, forever wars, corporate ownership and running the nation. =
And how do we do that?</div><div><br></div><div>Non-reformist reforms (Gorz=
), transitional demands (Trotsky), and Luxemburg who wrote about "The strug=
gle for reforms is its means; the social revolution, its goal" (https://soc=
ialistworker.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Reform.pdf). Their revolution=
ary-socialist strategies focus on reforms that increase workers power.&nbsp=
;</div><div><br></div><div>Abolishing police as a plank in a reform platfor=
m that becomes legislation does nothing, by itself, to empower the people w=
ho are most affected by crime in a capitalist social order of "all against =
all" where powerful exploit powerless. Community self defense or "peace kee=
ping" might be transitional, non-reformist reforms if they deepen democrati=
c organization within the community and transfer power from a state entity =
to organized working people.</div><div><br></div><div>Mark</div><div><br></=
div><div>p.s. One final note. There is a body of contemporary work on trans=
itional/non-reformist reforms that is news to me (https://en.wikipedia.org/=
wiki/Non-reformist_reform). This includes work produced by legal scholars l=
ike Amna Akbar (https://www.nyulawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/NYU=
Law-93-3-Akbar.pdf). I have not digested these materials yet, but the cross=
over is interesting regardless of the content.</div><div><br></div><div><br=
></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><br></body></html>

<div width=3D"1" style=3D"color:white;clear:both">_._,_._,_</div>

<hr>


Groups.io Links:<p>


 =20
    You receive all messages sent to this group.
 =20
 =20


<p>
<a target=3D"_blank" href=3D"https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/42685">Vi=
ew/Reply Online (#42685)</a> |


  <a target=3D"_blank" href=3D"mailto:[email protected]?subject=3DRe:%20Re=
%3A%20%5Bmarxmail%5D%20Democratic%20Socialists%20Further%20Advance">Reply t=
o Group</a>
 =20
    | <a target=3D"_blank" href=3D"mailto:[email protected]?subject=3DPriva=
te:%20Re:%20Re%3A%20%5Bmarxmail%5D%20Democratic%20Socialists%20Further%20Ad=
vance">Reply to Sender</a>
 =20

|

  <a target=3D"_blank" href=3D"https://groups.io/mt/120458891/6024700">Mute=
 This Topic</a>


| <a href=3D"https://groups.io/g/marxmail/post">New Topic</a>

<br>


<hr style=3D"width:25%;margin-right:100%">POSTING RULES &amp; NOTES<br />
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.<br />
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly &amp; permanently archived.<br />
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.<br />
#4 Do not exceed five posts a day.<hr style=3D"width:25%;margin-right:100%"=
>

<a href=3D"https://groups.io/g/marxmail/editsub/6024700">Your Subscription<=
/a> |
<a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]">Contact Group Owner</a> |

<a href=3D"https://groups.io/g/marxmail/leave/10173629/6024700/1441833971/x=
yzzy">Unsubscribe</a>

 [[email protected]]<br>
<div width=3D"1" style=3D"color:white;clear:both">_._,_._,_</div>


--Apple-Mail=_41D8C5B8-9327-4360-AF7F-9AB019D5B397--