Re: How DSA fixes a political problem
"John Reimann via groups.io" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.politics.marxism.marxmail |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAFGnm-DNmp22NLZCJ+3aHWWWbszA0YH9uc60FmLmCCccGWh8LA@mail.gmail.com> |
Marv Gandall writes: "the conundrum the revolutionary left has historically faced in the developed Western capitalist societies since its inception is that the working class has generally been interested in democratic rights only insofar as it has perceived these to have a direct bearing on its material conditions of existence - notably, the right to vote in the electoral realm and to organize unions and bargain collectively for improved wages and benefits in the workplace." But the right to vote *is *a democratic right. And workers' concerns go beyond that too. We have, for example, the scandals around ICE murdering people. Even before then, there were the protests against police involved shootings and murders, the most famous of which was the George Floyd murder. And that doesn't even take into account international issues. So I don't think economics is all that motivates workers, never mind the youth. In any case, what most workers think about first and foremost and what revolutionary socialists bring to the forefront are not necessarily the same thing. I think Trump's attacks on all the institutions through which bourgeois democracy functions are vitally important. These include Trump's attacks on universities, the capitalist new media, major capitalist law firms, and more. It also includes the presence of election deniers on many election boards around the country. Almost all revolutionary socialists ignore these attacks in favor of a crude interpretation of Marxism. They tend to focus exclusively on the direct class struggle,Trump's attacks on minorities, etc.. I think this is a huge mistake. We cannot just focus on relations between the classes; if we are serious we must bring to the fore what is happening *within* the capitalist class. How else can we develop a birds' eye view of society? Failing to do this leads to little but reformism. Yes, of course, we should explain how it affects the working class, but that doesn't contradict this point. Of course, how can this be done when discussion of the objective situation almost never happens? From what I can tell, it doesn't happen in the "revolutionary" sects, including the "revolutionary" DSA caucuses, and it doesn't happen in DSA as a whole. John Reimann -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#43147): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/43147 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/120853362/6024700 -=-=- POSTING RULES & NOTES #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived. #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. #4 Do not exceed five posts a day. -=-=- Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/marxmail/leave/10173629/6024700/1441833971/xyzzy [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-