Re: [ox-en] Commons in a taxonomy of goods

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scarcity

2010/6/19 Diego Saravia <dsa-AySywPH+/[email protected]>:
>> However, satisfying needs is only a secondary effect of producing goods
>> as commodities, the first and alien goal is to make money. In order to
>> make money goods must be scarce. Thus scarcity is a defect by design,
>> because due to being a precondition of selling commodities scarcity can
>> never be overcome.
>
>
> Production  system reflects the fact that economics goods are scarce
>
> We have not enough petroleoum, iron, etc. to increase production over
> certain levels
>
> Scarcity is not a design defect, only in intelectual goods limited by
> the means of copyright.
>
> Its a fact of a material world, you will make Green Party, very angry
> http://www.numbersusa.com/content/learn/issues/environment/bottleneck.html
>
> Off course we have a very unequal distribution system, that was
> correctly described and explained by Marx.
>
> And we can reduce a lot of poverty  if we can change that distribution
> system, but we cannot have a production system without limits.
>
>>Yes, my proposal is to distinguish between limitation -- and there are
>>limitations for a lot of resources -- and scarcity, which I would agree
>>is "artificial limitation" or as you put it "limitation by design".
>
> perhaps what you are trying to call scarcity is normally called
> poverty, or unequal distribution.
>
> what you call limits is usually called scarcity
> what you call scarcity is usually called unequal distribution or poverty
>
> --
> Diego Saravia
> [email protected]
> NO FUNCIONA->dsa-AySywPH+/[email protected]
>



-- 
Diego Saravia
[email protected]
NO FUNCIONA->dsa-AySywPH+/[email protected]

_________________________________
Web-Site: http://www.oekonux.org/
Organization: http://www.oekonux.de/projekt/
Contact: [email protected]